Comments for Complex Event Processing | Complex Event Processing

Comment on Wall Street traders mine tweets to gain a trading edge by Fast Data hits the Big Data fast lane | Geek

Fast Data hits the Big Data fast lane | Geek — Sun, 19 May 2013 05:37:46 +0000

[...] Wall Street firms routinely analyze live market feeds, and in many cases, run sophisticated complex event processing (CEP) programs on event streams (often in real time) to make operational decisions. [...]

Comment on Rapide by Real-time Big Data or Small Data? – Jim Kaskade

Real-time Big Data or Small Data? – Jim Kaskade — Fri, 10 May 2013 04:25:57 +0000

[...] Rapide [...]

Comment on Does anyone care about event processing? by mengusoglu

mengusoglu — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:48:30 +0000

The main reason for Complex Event Processing not taking off is that developers do not have the courage for trying new ideas. Universities have a big role in that sense as they can teach this new paradigm before programmers are locked into the classical programming framework.
Once people start thinking in events rather than input-output oriented aproach I am sure we will see a much better adoption rate for CEP.

Comment on Wall Street traders mine tweets to gain a trading edge by Fast Data hits the Big Data Fast Lane | OnStrategies Perspectives

Fast Data hits the Big Data Fast Lane | OnStrategies Perspectives — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:01:43 +0000

[...] was traditionally restricted to a handful of extremely high-value use cases. For instance: • Wall Street firms routinely analyze live market feeds, and in many cases, run sophisticated complex event processing [...]

Comment on Why Companies Should Develop Event Models by More interest in Event Modelling? | ctrlaltcep

More interest in Event Modelling? | ctrlaltcep — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:27:47 +0000

[...] to read (via Opher’s blog) about event modelling being promoted by Prof David Luckham and Gartner’s Roy Schulte. This is a topic that comes up [...]

Comment on Why Companies Should Develop Event Models by Rainer von Ammon

Rainer von Ammon — Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:29:47 +0000

Hi David & Roy

I just read your paper from your complexevents website (which I like very much, especially in its new outfit:-))

2007 I wrote a paper with some students of my CEP course and a professor of U Regensburg
Rainer v. Ammon, Christian Silberbauer, Christian Wolff
Domain Specific Reference Models for Event Patterns – for Faster Developing of Business Activity Monitoring Applications
VIPSI 2007 Lake Bled, Slovenia, 8-11 October 2007
http://www.citt-online.com/downloads/ReferenceModelsEventPatterns_with_Appendix_v3.pdf

It was the basic idea of our first project proposal DoReMoPat 2007 to the European FP7/ICT call-1 which did not make it unfortunately, because we did not find a coordinator for this project proposal:
DoReMoPat: Domain Specific Reference Models for Complex Event Processing Patterns

It was also the original basic idea of the EASSy proposal (Event-driven Adaptiveness of Service-based Systems) which did not make it aigain in call-5, 2009, although IBM took the coordinator role as a big dog http://www.citt-online.com/index.php?id=veranstaltungen&id3=haifa09&id4=more.

We now follow this idea (never give up) on the basis of the ARTS standard of the Notification Event Architecture for Retail (NEAR) in our just submitted proposal uCepCortex with a special work package or task about NEAT (Notification Event Architecture of Thought), see e.g. http://forum.complexevents.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=257&p=1312#p1312 or http://www.citt-online.com/downloads/uCepCortex-proposal-2G.pdf, the final version of the proposal was changed a bit when we have submitted it 15 Jan 2013, but not the NEAT part as one of the most challenging tasks. NEAT will be an important precondition for future products based on Brain-Computer-Brain Interfaces.

It’s also a part of the upcoming PhD thesis of Christoph Emmersberger to develop a NEAL (for the Logistics domain), see e.g.

Existing and future standards for event-driven business process management.
Rainer von Ammon, Christoph Emmersberger, Thomas Ertlmaier, Opher Etzion, Thomas Paulus, Florian Springer
Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, DEBS 2009, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, July 6-9, 2009; 01/2009
http://www.citt-online.com/downloads/DEBS_2009_-_Existing_and_Future_Standards_for_EDBPM_final.pdf

Cheers,

Rainer

Comment on Does anyone care about event processing? by Distributed Weekly 166 — Scott Banwart's Blog

Distributed Weekly 166 — Scott Banwart's Blog — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:46:47 +0000

[...] Does anyone care about event processing? [...]

Comment on Does anyone care about event processing? by Rainer von Ammon

Rainer von Ammon — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:49:59 +0000

Please find my 2 cents http://forum.complexevents.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=321&p=1439#p1439

Rainer

Comment on Does anyone care about event processing? by opher

opher — Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:46:30 +0000

As for EPTS I agree with Roy that it should position itself towards everybody that is dealing with any kind of event in any form, and not just users of COTS products.
More in: http://epthinking.blogspot.co.il/2012/07/event-processing-in-practice.html

Opher

Comment on Using news to reduce risk by Complex Event Processing | Using news to reduce risk | Oil Shares - BP Share Price

Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:37:05 +0000

[...] Continue reading here: Complex Event Processing | Using news to reduce risk [...]